You are hereForums / Past Elections / 2010 Congressional Elections / Murkowski Concedes in Alaska

Murkowski Concedes in Alaska


By Kelly Thomas - Posted on 31 August 2010

Link from The Hill. Looks like Palin favorite, Mr. "Tea Party" Joe Miller wins the Alaska Senate Republican Primary against Palin rival Lisa Murkowski, giving the Democrat a chance in another race which was supposed to be a safe GOP seat.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) conceded Tuesday night after failing to gain enough votes on Republican challenger Joe Miller in Tuesday's count of absentee ballots.

Speaking at her campaign headquarters in Anchorage, Murkowski said that based on the vote count: "I don't see a scenario where the primary will turn out in my favor."

Murkowski's concession completes what is one of the most shocking upsets of the political season to this point and it marks the third primary defeat of a sitting senator in 2010.

Miller, who was backed by the Tea Party Express and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R), will face Sitka Mayor Scott McAdams (D) in November's general election. The seat is expected to remain in Republican hands.

State elections officials tallied some 15,000 votes Tuesday -- the vast majority of the ballots that were remaining. Given that Murkowski picked up less than 200 votes from that batch, it was unlikely that she would be able to overtake Miller. 

Miller began the day with a lead of 1,668 votes and as of 5 p.m. local time in Alaska, he still led by 1,469.

Murkowski wasn't initially expected to face a strong challenge in 2010, but Miller's campaign got an early jolt from Palin and the Tea Party Express.


Even though Tea Party activists have provided the fuel for several primary upsets this election season, the conventional wisdom ahead of Alaska’s contest was that it would mark a rare success for the incumbent this primary season. That did not happen, however.

The Tea Party Express adropped more than $500,000 on TV and radio ads to aid Miller's campaign, and he had the backing of Palin and of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, both rumored presidential contenders in 2012.

Palin, who endorsed Miller in June, recorded a last-minute robocall for the campaign that went out to voters the Monday before the primary. She also posted a fundraising appeal on her Facebook page that Monday trumpeting Miller's efforts to raise $30,000 for a late TV buy. She did not campaign with him.

Miller credited Palin with helping his victory.

Here are PPP polls which show how Murkowski is a much stronger candidate against McAdams

Sunday Aug. 29

Miller 47, McAdams 39 (Miller + 8)

Murkowski 60, McAdams 28 (Murkowski + 32)

PPP poll states that... McAdams benefits from a more united party, getting 81% of the Democratic vote to Miller’s 73% of the Republicans. The candidates split even with independents at 42%, a good number for Democrats in a year where their candidates are largely getting blown out with that group of voters.

There is a major chance for an upset... It would be even better if Murkowski ran 3rd party

Well, I guess not...

Libertarian Party rules out Murkowski swap...

Another of the state's minor parties, the Alaskan Independence Party, has flatly ruled out nominating Murkowski as well, leaving a difficult write-in candidacy...

Source

Could she run as an Indpendent?
Rasmussen-yes Rasmussen has McAdams only down by 6. They changed it from "likely GOP" to "Lean GOP." Some are speculating that Murkowski will endorse McAdams (he has been very complimentary of her lately.) McAdmas was interviewed on Rachel Maddow tonight. Seems like a pretty good, well-qualified candidate.

One problem for McAdams is that Alaska's other U.S. senator, Mark Begich, is a Democrat. It is unlikely that Alaska, which has been a traditionally Republican state, would have 2 Dems as senators.

And there may still be a pro-Stevens GOP and independent vote in this contest (even though Stevens is now deceased, and this seat was not Stevens'--Begich has that).

Should be an interesting contest.

I'm so glad that we have Joe Miller now! Why the heck should we have moderate RINOs in red states. Its different if its Florida, a swing state, or Massachusetts, a blue state. In swing states and blue states, RINOs are fine, but not in red states. Finally, Murkowski is out.
OK-but do you at least acknowledge that pushing that RINO out of the way in Alaska means that the Democrat has a much better chance? Your guy is not being shy about wanting to get rid of Social Security (even Sharon Angle quickly walked back her extreme statements on SS after the primary, changed her web page and pretended she never said what she did about it.) Even conservative Alaskans may have issues with his extreme stand. Let's ask Tea Party participants if they would be ok with the government taking their SS away. Let's see how they react.

Its a red state and a Republican who isn't moderate can win, so why not have a conservative republican.

 As I said, if it were New York, I wouldn't mind having a RINO, or if it were Vermont, I would mind having a RINO. We should never get rid of Snowe and Collins from Maine even though they're RINOs.

Secondly, phasing out Social Security and making it a state issue isn't so extreme. I ask you, what is extreme? Privately saving money for retirement or $13 trillion of debt?

Follow RFO:

TwitterCafe PressFacebook

RSS

 

 

RFO Gear