You are hereForums / Miscellaneous Chit-Chat / Maybe pointless, does internet affect economy??

Maybe pointless, does internet affect economy??


By BlakeyV - Posted on 06 January 2009

  As pointless as this is I was just thinking does internet in anyway hurt economy. I know many ways it helps but is there also a downside? I mean, cds for example. Why would you go buy one when you get it for free. Books, especially non fiction. Why would you go buy one when all the info you need is on here. Newspapers, why would you go buy one when you can read it on here. Movies, you can watch on here. Even maybe home doctoring can be done from here. Maybe there is much more that I am leaving out and maybe this is just stupid thinking. I don't know, but I wonder what others think? I remember the post where online has passed newspapers, it has to help someone and hurt someone, right??
BTW, Suzi what is your email??

suzi@republicansforobama.org

Are you sending me an invitation to your inauguration party Blakey? ;-)

 Yes, my inauguration party. Just as soon as I figure out what to be president of.

It's a good question, Blake. 

I believe that changes happen no matter what... the industrial revolution; PC's in every home; the Internet. 

Some companies will be hurt, but there are other companies that will be on the cutting edge and will emerge with a new way to provide a service and earn a profit from every change, IMO.  So I believe that any negative impact will eventually be negated by positives. 

 

Great issues raised, Blakey, and a lot of questions raised in the industries you mentioned. While most trades (print media, notably) have adapted themselves to the online world whether to survive or to innovate, it seems that the entertainment industry (movies and music) has been the slowest at doing this-- namely, because of people sharing files, they have consistently viewed the Internet as a hindrance to their business. My unsubstantiated theory about that is that the music and movie industries have retained almost total control over their respective markets, including production, promotion, and distribution, and the Internet is a way for the artists, directors, and other players to break away on their own. There's been shifts in tactics of late from their campaign of lawsuits against random folks online, so there may be hope yet that they realize they can't sue their own customers and not face backlash. But I wouldn't hold my breath.

As to your main question, I guess there have been tradeoffs-- newspapers are struggling because they got to the online arena late. The dot-com bubble demonstrated that slapping a .com to a stupid idea is still akin to putting makeup on porcine. One wonders that with the increased speed at which knowledge is moved online, disinformation, malware, and spam can move just as fast. What effects this has on the economy as a whole is something I'll defer to someone who knows economics.

----

And there's no sense crying over every mistake
You just keep on trying 'til you run out of cake.

Collecting TAXES is the biggest downside for politicians, since most internet transactions are exempt from state sales tax collection and protectionist regulation.

In many ways, the Internet is the world's largest Free Trade environment----something the pro-government regulators and taxers can't stand.

In my state for example, people are supposed to (voluntarily) declare out-of-state purchases for the purpose of sales tax collection when filing their state tax return.

Of course, nobody ever does.    Only a fool would voluntarily pay sales taxes for some doodad bought on Ebay for example.

With billions of Internet purchases going on, the pro-government shmucks would love to get their tax-hungry hands on those transactions.

There remain significant Constitutional questions whether such regulations are legal.

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=2187

It's a headache for companies marketing to adjacent territories, as well. There was a brouhaha a year or two ago when Valve marketed Half-Life 2 (I think) to Australia at one price point, and Thailand at a lower price point. The intrepid Aussies then proceeded to import the Thai version, which prompted Valve to invalidate the Thai versions installed in Australia. There's another case where Sony effectively shut down a trading company specializing in Japanese game imports to Europe. Of course, this is the consequences of globalization versus interstate commerce taxation, but you can't help but see the similarities.

And "pro-government shmucks", should probably include just about everyone in government, Republican or Democrat, because they always look out for new revenue opportunities. They'll be tempted more than ever now that most states are essentially broke and are required to never deficit-spend.

----

And there's no sense crying over every mistake
You just keep on trying 'til you run out of cake.

I guess though as I named some of the reasons it might hurt some it probably more than evens out in helping other businesses. I know I for one do quite a bit of ordering online. You can find what you want{most of the time} and you don't have to put up with people other than the UPS man. Gotta love ebay and even I know how to use it, its that easy. "So easy, even a Blakey can do it" Watch out caveman.

Follow RFO:

TwitterCafe PressFacebook

RSS

 

 

RFO Gear

Subscribe to General RFO Newsletter

General news and announcements for republicansforobama.org. We will never share or sell your email address.